I didn't eat as many
eggs
as the cannibalizing
hen
house.
I ate just enough to
be strong.
to
be strong.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Sunday, July 12, 2009
something to remember
the key to a successful neighborhood is capitalizing on local and peer-to-peer knowledge.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
The Associated Tensions
that was the day I wrote What is Good.
at the time not much was good and
it seemed like a relevant question.
it was winter and Jim and I were trapped
in the mindset that poetic young men
fall into when the femme fatales they love
prove their identities as femme fatales
and leave their poetic young men alone
and hungry in the winter of two thousand and nine.
was it a cold winter? I could not tell you.
I left for a month, mid-way through,
and ambled through San Francisco and
Los Angeles, lost. I read two books by
J.D. Salinger in an attic in Portrero Hill.
I smoked cigarettes of short days
in that attic. I read a book by David Foster Wallace;
my favorite story was Octets because the narrator
addresses the reader, in theater called 'breaking the fourth wall,' which is a literary device I like much better
than meta-narration, which is when an author inserts him or herself in the story
that he or she is writing at the moment. I think it's easy and
an escape hatch that an old schizophrenic invented and used well
but now has been co-opted by semi-talented young people
like myself who don't know any better than to throw themselves
into the middle of a sword fight.
understand me here, the previous
stanza (?) is not to establish my qualifications as
a reader, always blooming with book.
or even if you've established that already,
it was not to tell you about who I read because we all know,
even if we resist the notion in conversation, that the implications of
a persons favorite authors says quite a bit about them.
you might have guessed that I am
concerned with the shredding edges of authenticity.
you would not be wrong about my associated tensions.
maybe you would say that I am wordy and I tend to
intellectualize things that need not be intellectualized.
foregoing my pride and self-image, you would not be wrong.
you may have ignored though,
in your quest to tear back my fourteen layers of skin
and reveal my plastic musculature,
the inherent mysticism in these works.
and now what?
you venture to ask me of god?
well.
this is where we end.
at the time not much was good and
it seemed like a relevant question.
it was winter and Jim and I were trapped
in the mindset that poetic young men
fall into when the femme fatales they love
prove their identities as femme fatales
and leave their poetic young men alone
and hungry in the winter of two thousand and nine.
was it a cold winter? I could not tell you.
I left for a month, mid-way through,
and ambled through San Francisco and
Los Angeles, lost. I read two books by
J.D. Salinger in an attic in Portrero Hill.
I smoked cigarettes of short days
in that attic. I read a book by David Foster Wallace;
my favorite story was Octets because the narrator
addresses the reader, in theater called 'breaking the fourth wall,' which is a literary device I like much better
than meta-narration, which is when an author inserts him or herself in the story
that he or she is writing at the moment. I think it's easy and
an escape hatch that an old schizophrenic invented and used well
but now has been co-opted by semi-talented young people
like myself who don't know any better than to throw themselves
into the middle of a sword fight.
understand me here, the previous
stanza (?) is not to establish my qualifications as
a reader, always blooming with book.
or even if you've established that already,
it was not to tell you about who I read because we all know,
even if we resist the notion in conversation, that the implications of
a persons favorite authors says quite a bit about them.
you might have guessed that I am
concerned with the shredding edges of authenticity.
you would not be wrong about my associated tensions.
maybe you would say that I am wordy and I tend to
intellectualize things that need not be intellectualized.
foregoing my pride and self-image, you would not be wrong.
you may have ignored though,
in your quest to tear back my fourteen layers of skin
and reveal my plastic musculature,
the inherent mysticism in these works.
and now what?
you venture to ask me of god?
well.
this is where we end.
Friday, July 3, 2009
bricks in the half-light
to him that eyes deceive:
you are wrong.
no deception is portrayed through
an iris,
no trick played in light.
you say you basked
in thunderstorm half-light?
you say brick,
caressed and softened by July rain,
is more beautiful than the most
beautiful mountain lake?
I assure you that you are right.
Pastoral folks,
in their traditional vantage of aesthetics,
will tell you that a bear
sturdily creeping in a patch of queen anne's lace
is the pinnacle of beauty;
they would not be wrong.
You,
man of the city,
drinker of humanity
of mortar,
of asphalt,
neither would you be wrong
to believe that
a cavalry of headlights
on a rivery avenue is the
great white light,
the center of retinal gravity that
no man can willfully resist.
you are wrong.
no deception is portrayed through
an iris,
no trick played in light.
you say you basked
in thunderstorm half-light?
you say brick,
caressed and softened by July rain,
is more beautiful than the most
beautiful mountain lake?
I assure you that you are right.
Pastoral folks,
in their traditional vantage of aesthetics,
will tell you that a bear
sturdily creeping in a patch of queen anne's lace
is the pinnacle of beauty;
they would not be wrong.
You,
man of the city,
drinker of humanity
of mortar,
of asphalt,
neither would you be wrong
to believe that
a cavalry of headlights
on a rivery avenue is the
great white light,
the center of retinal gravity that
no man can willfully resist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
